2016 - 2018 CREATIVE AND INNOVATIONS PRODUCED RESEARCH OUTPUTS QUALIFYING FOR DHET SUBSIDY
Due date for submission: 15 August 2019
Please submit all 2016-2018 research outputs to the Department of Research Management for subsidy. Authors must please liaise amongst each other as to who will submit the output to prevent duplications – all Nelson Mandela University authors listed on the publication will be counted.
-
The Policy on the Evaluation of Creative Outputs and Innovations Produced by Public Higher Education Institutions (2017) of the DHET must be read before you complete the relevant documentation as per DHET requirements
-
Faculties and departments must please ensure that this is circulated to all Research Associates & HEAVA Professors linked to the faculty or department.
CREATIVE OUTPUTS
A submission template has been created at the following URL link: https://creativeoutput.mandela.ac.za/
The following guideline and checklist has been created to assist with a successful submission regarding the above-mentioned DHET outputs.
Attach the following supporting documentation via a zip file
-
The DHET spreadsheet need to be completed by the applicant for each the specific year (if applicable) and relevant sub-field
-
The annotation which briefly contextualizes the creative output (between 500-700 words), should address all the areas mentioned below:
-
Overview of the output: a brief outline of the background information relevant to the output;
-
Conceptual and scholarly framework in which it should be heard or viewed;
-
Locate the output within the discipline and demonstrate the contribution to new knowledge; and
-
A public profile of the output (venue/s, date and year of publication and award(s) received), proof must be attached.
3. Proof of any awards received
Accompanying the submission must be copies of awards received by the scholar/s in relation to the submission and where such awards exist.
4. Declarations (see attached declaration letter to be completed and signed)
4.1 Of originality;
4.2 That the work generated has not been copied and that the ideas are those of the
claiming creator/s;
4.3 Authorship / co-authorship and disclosure of the other active participants in the
production of the work.
5. Peer reviewers template completed (with all relevant details)
CHECKLIST
This checklist can be used to make sure you have completed and attached all the relevant information required. Incomplete submission/s will not be sent to DHET for consideration.
|
No
|
Checklist of the required information
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
1
|
DHET spreadsheet completed in full (relevant parts)
|
|
|
|
2
|
Annotation completed with all the relevant areas describes, as requested
|
|
|
|
|
Overview of the output: a brief outline of the background information relevant to the output
|
|
|
|
|
Conceptual and scholarly framework in which it should be heard or viewed;
|
|
|
|
|
Locate the output within the discipline and demonstrate the contribution to new knowledge;
|
|
|
|
|
A public profile of the output (venue/s, date and year of publication and award(s) received), proof must be attached.
|
|
|
|
3
|
Proof of awards attached
|
|
|
|
4
|
Declaration template signed
|
|
|
|
5
|
Peer reviewers template completed (with all relevant details)
|
|
|